Game of the Year: 6th Place --------------------------------------------
by League Commissioner IM Greg Shahade
--------------------------------------------
This is part of a
series of weekly articles that will determine
what
game was voted as the Best Game of 2006. The only games eligible for
Game of the Year are
the thirteen "Games of the Week".
There are four judges ranking the games from 1st to 13th. If a game is
ranked as 1st place by a
judge, it receives 13 points and if it's ranked 13th place, it receives
1
point and so on. If there is a tie, whichever game had the highest
individual
ranking will win on tiebreak. Thus if one game is ranked 1st by 2
judges, and another game is ranked 1st only by one judge, the one that
is ranked 1st by more judges is awarded the higher position.
The four judges are:
IM Greg Shahade (USCL Commissioner)
NM Arun Sharma
NM Dennis Monokroussos (Regular commentator for ChessBase.com)
GM Alex Shabalov+WFM Elizabeth Vicary (These two worked as a team to
determine their rankings) 6th Place: IM
Josh Friedel
(SF) vs GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) 1/2-1/2
Friedel vs Charbonneau after 45. Ne7
Black found the cute tactic 45....Be5, sending the large
Internet crowd into a fervor.
Below are comments from the judges on what position they ranked this
game and their reason for doing so, in parenthesis is the ranking given
by that judge and the number of points awarded for that ranking:
IM Greg Shahade(1st place: 13 points): I was alone
in my high ranking of this game, but I can explain. All fans love games
where the outcome is in doubt until the very last moment, where both
players are going at it from move 1 and where until the game is
actually over, no one can determine the final result. Some examples of
great sporting events are the fight between Hagler and Hearns,
the
recent NFL playoff game between New England and Indianapolis. I believe
if you look at these events objectively, you cannot say that they were
better played than other sporting events, but simply that they were
most dramatic.
This game was being played where it was pretty clear
that the result of the League Championship Match would be riding upon
it. After 84 hard fought moves, they finally agreed to a draw in a
situation where if either side won, their team would have been the USCL
Champion. Also please note that a lot of the
blunder moments came when the players were in dire time trouble.
After move 40 both players had about 5 minutes left with the thirty
second increment. Given the immense pressure and the stakes of the
game, I don't think a few missteps are all that improbable. There were
people who were watching the game online who even kibitzed "This is the
game of the year". I decided to let the fans have what they want, yet
the other judges have let me down.
NM
Dennis Monokroussos (6th Place: 8 points): A very exciting
see-saw struggle that saw both players fight very hard on defense. From
a purely dramatic standpoint, it's the game of the year, at least given
the choices. But 45. Ne7 is really awful.
GM Alex
Shabalov and WFM Elizabeth
Vicary (8th Place: 6 points): Meatball vs Loverboy (At
least one of these nicknames will be explained in future weeks).
AS: (Move 32): Somebody's better, I just don't understand who.
AS: (After the Game): Nice tricks by the loverboy. Unusual things can
happen in the dark valley of reason when the loverboy meets the
meatball. One of those twilights of the mind.
NM Arun
Sharma (10th Place: 4 points): In terms of excitement,
this game may have been the best as it was from the Championship Match.
While being well played for the most part, it was difficult for me to
overlook the fact that the most exciting moments of the game occurred
due to blunders from one side (ie 45. Ne5 Be5!! and then Black giving
the exchange back about 20 moves later). This was why I couldn't rank
this game higher than most of the others, despite it's huge dramatic
factor.